REL 406: Religion and Reproduction

The Presbyterian Church of the United States of America (PC(USA)) General Assembly originally released a statement that argued that a woman should have a partial birth abortion if it made the most sense for her health, permitting women to get the necessary care she needs. However, a Lay Committee came together in 2002 - prior to Bush signing the ban into effect - to argue that the denomination had failed to “cherish and protect the lives of infants,” citing John 10:10. [1] The PC(USA) General Assembly did not change their stance based on the opinion of the Lay Committee, but the denomination became more split politically because of partial birth abortions.

In the article "FIRST-PERSON: Partial-birth abortion & our nation’s health," Ben Mitchell discusses the ethical and moral implications of partial-birth abortions. He argues that these procedures, which involve delivering a live fetus and then terminating it, are unethical and inhumane. Mitchell's stance is based on his Christian faith, which holds that all human life is sacred and should be protected. He also cites medical evidence that suggests that partial-birth abortions are not medically necessary and can pose risks to the mother's health. Mitchell acknowledges that the issue of partial-birth abortions is complex and emotionally charged. However, he believes that it is important for Christians to speak out against these procedures and to advocate for policies that protect the sanctity of human life.